检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:池志培[1] 陈沛琦 CHI Zhipei;CHEN Peiqio(Institute of Defence Economics and Management,Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081,China)
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学国防经济与管理研究院,北京100081
出 处:《国防科技》2023年第6期17-23,共7页National Defense Technology
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(22BGJ006);北京市高校高精尖学科“战略经济与××××”交叉学科支持项目(GJJ2019163);中央财经大学双一流和特色发展引导学科专项项目(022959918005)。
摘 要:随着一种名为持续性决议的预算工具在美国预算过程中越来越频繁地出现,恰当地理解其对国防预算的影响以及美国国防部门的应对,对全面了解美国国防预算越来越必要。在分析美国持续性决议的基础上,对其包含的6方面要素进行详细讨论。研究表明,持续性决议不仅导致不必要的效率损失和资金紧张,同时对于国防采购、军队战备和人员管理都有不利影响。但是,由于其反复出现,美国国防部也逐步发展出各种应对措施,尽量减少其负面影响。With the growing prevalence of the budgetary tool,the Continuing Resolution in the United States budget process,it becomes increasingly crucial to comprehend its impact on the defence budget and the responses from the U.S.Department of Defense.Based on an analysis of Continuing Resolution,a comprehensive exploration,delving into intricate details regarding its six constituent elements is undertaken.The research underscores that continuing resolution results in unnecessary efficiency losses and financial constraints and adversely affects defense procurement,military readiness,and personnel management.However,recognizing its recurrent nature,the U.S.Department of Defense has progressively implemented various mitigation strategies to reduce its negative impacts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145