检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹梦瑶 ZOU Mengyao
机构地区:[1]武汉市社会科学院哲学研究所,湖北武汉430019
出 处:《学习与实践》2023年第12期133-140,共8页Study and Practice
摘 要:作为被数字技术全面中介化了的交往实践,网络社区交往经历着主体符号化、形式技术化与规则多元化的样态转型,也面临着道德相对主义盛行、信任机制趋向混沌和隐私悖论持续升级等现实伦理困境。弥合网络社区交往伦理应然价值目标与实然伦理困境之间的巨大差距,需要通过推进公民伦理、平台伦理与制度伦理“三位一体”的伦理重构,进一步打造公共空间、促成公共理解、引导公共行动,推动网络社区交往生态的全面优化。As a communication practice that has been fully mediated by digital technology,online community communication has undergone a transformation of subject symbolization,formal technicalization,and rule diversification.At the same time,online community communication faces practical ethical dilemmas such as the prevalence of moral relativism,the trend of chaotic trust mechanisms,and the continuous escalation of privacy paradoxes.To bridge the huge gap between the"expected value goals"and"actual ethical dilemmas"of online community communication ethics,it is necessary to promote the reconstruction of the"trinity"of civic ethics,platform ethics,and institutional ethics to further create public spaces,promote public understanding,guide public actions,and promote the comprehensive optimization of the online community communication ecology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63