检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲁绪胜 黄建 齐吉琳 LU Xusheng;HUANG Jian;QI Jilin(School of Civil and Traffic Engineering,Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Beijing 100044)
机构地区:[1]北京建筑大学土木与交通工程学院,北京100044
出 处:《北京建筑大学学报》2023年第6期8-17,共10页Journal of Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture
基 金:国家自然科学基金(41972279,52108293);北京市博士后科研活动经费资助(2021-zz-106)。
摘 要:土的种类众多且成因复杂,这使得土的分类难以统一,即不同行业和地区有不同的分类体系。然而,土作为建设工程的地基或填筑材料,其有效且统一的分类尤为重要。通过汇总对比的方法,首先分析了土分类所采用的通用指标与特殊指标,深入剖析了中国、欧洲、日本和北美地区的主要分类方法,总结了各分类法之间的异同点,并对我国分类法给出了建议。There are many types of soil and their causes are complex,which makes it difficult to classify soils in a uniform manner,that is,different industries and regions have different classification systems.However,as a foundation or filling material for construction projects,an effective and uniform classification of soil is particularly important.By means of summarization and comparison,firstly the common and special indexes used for soil classification are analysed,then the main classification methods in China,Europe,Japan and North America are deeply dissected,and the similarities and differences between the classification methods are summarized,giving suggestions for the classification methods in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7