中国业主撤销权制度的反思与重构  

REEVALUATING ANDRESTRUCTURINGTHEREGIME OF OWNERS'REVOCATION RIGHTS INCHINA

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:凌潇 Ling Xiao(the Chongqing Intellectual Property Operation Research Center of Law School of Chongqing Technology and Business University)

机构地区:[1]the Chongqing Intellectual Property Operation Research Center of Law School of Chongqing Technology and Business University

出  处:《China Legal Science》2023年第6期83-109,共27页中国法学(英文版)

基  金:supported by the Chongqing Technology and Business University High-Caliber Personnel ResearchInitiation Project,entitled Research on Industry Self-Regulation Issues in Intellectual Property (Grant No.2055011)。

摘  要:业主撤销权是中国民法体系中一种新类型的形成权。业主撤销权因业主成员权而生,从内、外两层法律关系分析入手,有助于解决诸如诉讼中的主体资格、权利行使构成要件、法律后果等实务难题。法院不宜过度限制当事人诉权,可以采取以程序合法性审查为原则,实质审查为例外的方式,以体现对业主自治的尊重,保护业主个体的基本权利,同时尽可能节约司法资源。The introduction of the entitlements known as the'owners'revocation rights'within China's civil law framework represents an innovative development.The disputes related to this matter often reveal profound contradictions,leading to significant complexities during the judicial resolution.Existing scholarship falls short of providing a comprehensive understanding of the intricate relationship between the owners'revocation rights and the membership rights of the owners.Consequently,proposed strategies and recommendations lack the harmonious integration of real right law and association law considerations,resulting in conflicting conclusions.The emergence of the owners'revocation rights is rooted in the membership rights,necessitating a dual-layer analysis that encompasses both internal and external juristic relationships.This approach is imperative for accurately comprehending and addressing practical challenges,such as the qualification for litigation(persona standi in judicio),the constitutive requirements for exercising such rights,and the legal consequences of relevant lawsuits.In practical application,it is unwise for the court to overly restrict litigants'rights to initiate lawsuits.Instead,an approach grounded in the principle of procedural legality assessment,with substantive review applied only as an exception,could be adopted.This approach demonstrates a commitment to upholding owners'autonomy,safeguarding the fundamental rights of individual owners,and concurrently striving to optimize the allocation of judicial resources.

关 键 词:合法性审查 权利行使 民法体系 司法资源 当事人诉权 实质审查 业主自治 基本权利 

分 类 号:D923[政治法律—民商法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象