检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李颖[1] Li Ying
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院
出 处:《电子知识产权》2023年第11期15-25,共11页Electronics Intellectual Property
摘 要:人工智能产品的不断推陈出新特别是ChatGPT的横空出世,给传统侵权责任法的框架体系和司法适用带来的很大冲击。本文结合相关案例和国内外立法,探讨数字时代如何把握人工智能产品的概念,并对各类人工智能产品引发的侵权应适用《民法典》网络侵权条款还是《产品质量法》,以及适用何种归责原则进行讨论,提出应以过错原则作为生成式人工智能侵权的归责原则,应进一步完善侵权免责事由、合理分配举证责任、细化人工智能产品各参与主体的义务和责任,并配套规定强制保险制度和赔偿基金,以完善我国人工智能产品侵权救济体系。The continuous innovation of artificial intelligence products,especially the emergence of ChatGPT,has brought a great impact on the framework system and judicial application of traditional tort liability law.This article combines relevant cases and domestic and foreign legislation to explore how to grasp the concept of artificial intelligence products in the digital age.It also discusses whether the infringement caused by various types of artificial intelligence products should be subject to the network infringement clause of the Civil Code or the Product Quality Liability Law,as well as what kind of liability principle should be applied.It proposes that the fault principle should be used as the liability principle for generative artificial intelligence infringement,and further improve the reasons for exemption from liability for infringement Reasonably allocate the burden of proof,refine the obligations and responsibilities of each participant in artificial intelligence products,and provide mandatory insurance systems and compensation funds to improve China's artificial intelligence product infringement relief system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229