检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方付建[1] 杨芳[1] FANG Fu-jian;YANG Fang
机构地区:[1]中南民族大学公共管理学院,湖北武汉430074
出 处:《中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2023年第12期33-41,205,共10页Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“中华民族伟大复兴视域下民族事务治理法治化研究”(19ZDA171)。
摘 要:为对民族团结进步地方立法质量进行科学有效的评估,利用PMC指数模型构建立法质量评价体系,对七个省份的民族团结进步条例文本展开测评。结果表明,省级民族团结进步立法质量总体较好,多数省份评价指数处于良好以上等级。其中,立法方式、责任确定、配套措施和责任追究四个维度总体得分较高,立法目标、内容设置、地域特色、可操作性四个维度总体得分偏低。同时,不同省份各项测量维度的得分存在明显差异。根据测评结果,需要注重条例文本修订,注重彰显地方特色优势,注重提升条例可操作性,切实做到用法律保障民族团结。To scientifically and effectively evaluate the quality of local legislation on national unity and progress,the PMC index model is used to build a legislative quality evaluation system to evaluate the texts of national unity and progress regulations in seven provinces.The results show that the overall quality of provincial-level national unity and progress legislation is good,and the evaluation index of most provinces is above the“good”level.Among them,the overall scores of the four dimensions,namely legislative method,responsibility determination,supporting measures and responsibility accountability,are relatively high,while the overall scores of other four dimensions,namely legislative objectives,content setting,regional characteristics and operability,are relatively low.At the same time,there are significant differences in the scores of various measurement dimensions in different provinces.According to the evaluation results,it is necessary to attach importance to the revisions of the regulation texts,emphasize the local characteristics,and improve the operability of regulations,so as to effectively safeguard the national unity by law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.153.166