论法庭审理中的被告人认罪撤回  

On Defendant's Right of Withdrawal of Plea of Guilty in Court Proceedings

作　　者：步洋洋 BU Yangyang

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学刑事法学院

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第11期86-97,共12页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目“认罪案件中庭审证据调查方式的特殊性研究”(20XFX010);陕西高校青年创新团队“大数据时代西北地区社会治理中的刑事法治”。

摘　　要：作为认罪认罚撤回概念项下的特定一种,法庭审理中的认罪撤回既不同于审前阶段的认罪撤回,也不同于法庭审理中的认罚撤回,而是必然伴随着因撤回而引申出的程序适用的转换、审理重点调整与具体证明方法的适用差异,具有不同于其他认罪或认罚撤回的于实体、程序与证据层面的三重功用,承载着昭示被告人作为刑事诉讼主体的自我决定权、弥补被告人权利处分能力不足、平衡控辩双方诉讼地位差异,以及实现商谈语义下“共识性正义”的积极功用。基于将法庭审理中的认罪撤回形塑成一种“备而不用、用而有效”的利益衡平机制与风险控制手段的目的考量,刑事立法与刑事司法当以从赋权与规制的双重径路出发,在回归认罪认罚撤回的权利本质,将法庭审理中的认罪撤回作为认罪被告人于法庭审理阶段所享有的程序性权利予以明确的同时,限定庭审认罪撤回的时间与庭审认罪撤回的理由。As a specific kind of concept under the withdrawal of plea of guilty and acceptance of punishment,withdrawal of plea of guilty in court proceedings not only differs from pre-trial stage,but also differs from the withdrawal of penalty in court proceedings.It has three functions in entity,procedure,and evidence that are different from other withdrawal of plea of guilty or acceptance of punishment.The withdrawal of plea of guilty in court proceedings not only causes a timely adjustment of the focus of the court trial from sentencing issues to substantive issues,creating the possibility of the application of a specific procedural system originally applicable to the court trial of a plea of not guilty,such as additional investigation at the trial stage,out-of-court investigation and verification by the judge,and adjudication based on the evidence on file,but also gives rise to multiple issues at the procedural level,such as the conversion of the application of trial procedures,the reconstitution of the trial organization,the confirmation of the effectiveness of previous procedures,and the proof of evidence in the context of retracted confessions,the manner of proof,methods,and the usefulness of evidence,which are inevitably accompanied by the withdrawal of a guilty plea.Bearing the weight of the positive function of showing the defendant as the main body of the criminal procedure to self-determination,making up for the lack of the defendant's ability to dispose of rights,balancing the difference of litigation status between prosecution and defense,and realizing“consensual justice”under the semantics of discussion,from the perspective of shaping withdrawal of plea of guilty in court proceedings into a benefit balancing mechanism and risk control of“saving for nothing,but using it effectively”,criminal legislation and criminal justice should start from the dual path of empowerment and regulation,return to the rights nature of withdrawal of plea of guilty and acceptance of punishment.While taking the withdrawal o

关 键 词：法庭审理 认罪撤回 效用 规制 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]