检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许田 卓加鹏 Xu Tian;Zhuo Jiapeng(Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers,Hefei 230039,Anhui,China;Anhui Science and Technology Information Research Institute,Hefei 230091,Anhui,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽警官职业学院,安徽合肥230039 [2]安徽省科学技术情报研究所,安徽合肥230091
出 处:《上海公安学院学报》2023年第6期41-47,共7页Journal of Shanghai Police College
摘 要:认罪认罚从宽程序适用于职务犯罪案件,具有节约司法资源、落实宽严相济刑事政策等多重意义,但其在运行过程也存在着自愿性保障不足、监检衔接机制不到位、从宽量刑建议缺乏具体指引等问题,应当通过落实值班律师制度、完善外部监督、加强监检衔接、出台量刑规则体系等多种手段进行改良,确保认罪认罚从宽程序在职务犯罪案件中发挥良好作用。The system of pleading guilty and lenient punishment,which is applicable to cases of professional crimes,has multiple significances such as saving judicial resources and implementing the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity.However,in the course of its operation,there exist some problems,such as insufficient voluntary supports,inadequate linkage between supervision and inspection departments,and lack of specific guidance for lenient sentencing recommendations.Improvement should be made by using various means such as implementing the duty lawyer system,bettering external supervision,strengthening the linkage between supervision and inspection,and enacting a series of sentencing rules so as to ensure that the lenient system will play a better role in handling cases of professional crimes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117