检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段宇城 Duan Yucheng(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042
出 处:《上海公安学院学报》2023年第6期68-78,共11页Journal of Shanghai Police College
摘 要:在实质性化解行政争议的政策倡导下,行政复议调解制度根据政策要求产生了相应制度实践。“应调尽调”理念在行政复议制度中的践行受制于程序性规定的相对不完善以及实践层面各地复议机关对于调解率的功利性追求,使得复议调解制度未发挥其应有的作用。应通过完善复议调解自身的制度规则,减少其对法治建设可能产生的抵触,并在明确其制度定位的基础上,构建完善的程序治理以实现实质性化解行政争议的目标。With the advocation of the policy of substantively solving administrative disputes and according to the policy requirements,the administrative review and mediation system has led to some related systems for practice.The implementation of the notion of"making as many efforts as possible to mediate"in the administrative review system is restrained by the relative imperfection of the procedural provisions and the review organs'utilitarian pursuit of the mediation rate at the practical level,thus making it impossible for the review and mediation system to play its due role.So it is necessary to improve the rules within reconsideration mediation system to reduce its possible conflict with the development of the law governance.Furthermore,based on the clarification of its system positioning,a perfect procedural governance should be realized just for the attainment of the goal of substantively solving administrative disputes.
分 类 号:D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15