检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张广生[1] ZHANG Guangsheng
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学国际关系学院
出 处:《社会科学》2023年第12期102-110,共9页Journal of Social Sciences
摘 要:在现代西方的冲击之下,东亚儒法文明中的中国和日本共同把富强作为最急迫的国家应战目标,但是在“儒主法辅”还是“脱儒入法”这一大战略选择上两国则分道而行,日本不仅走向“脱儒入法”的资本一军国主义的发展道路,而且在文明归属上纠结于“脱亚入欧”;中国则在重建大一统文治国家的曲折探索中,迈向轴心文明国家的复兴。从区分利害与是非的高度上比较中日现代国家建设经验的得失,有助于我们从历史中汲取智慧,更深入地理解当代东亚世界的发展方向。Facing the challenge of the modern West,China and Japan as members of East Asian Confucian-Legalist civilization both aimed at power and wealth as their responses to the challenge.However,the paths of two nations were divided by two different grand-strategy alternatives:"rule of the Confucian way with the supplement of the Legalist means"or"departure from the Confucian way to the Legalist path".Japan eventually took a militarist path of development which embraced the strategy of"departure from Asia to Europe",increasingly eroding its civilization identity,while China strived towards its revival as an Axial civilization-state during its flexuous struggles to rebuild a centralized civil-rule state.In distinguishing the deliberation of interests with the evaluation on values,this article provides a comparative study on Chinese and Japanese modern state-building experiences in its attempt both to draw wisdom from history and to contribute to a deeper understanding of East Asia's contemporary development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.166.40