论我国行政调解制度的文本冲突与规范路径  

On the Textual Conflict and Normative Path of Chinese Administrative Mediation System

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:郭艳芳 陆洲 GUO Yan-fang;LU Zhou(School of Humanities and Law,YanShan University,Qinhuangdao Hebei 066004,China)

机构地区:[1]燕山大学文法学院,河北秦皇岛066004

出  处:《华北理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第1期14-19,共6页Journal of North China University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基  金:司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“我国行政调解制度的争点问题研究”(21SFB2011)。

摘  要:在建设“大调解”工作格局以及将“非诉纠纷解决机制”挺在前面的时代背景下,行政调解以其中立性、专业性与权威性深受青睐。但其生存空间却被人民调解和司法调解所挤压,我国现行法律文本中关于行政调解的规定在管辖主体、适用范围、程序设置、法律效力等方面也存在着冲突,影响其制度实效。为解决这些问题,有必要根据其适用范围的不同,采取二元结构,构建符合我国国情的行政调解制度,以实现纠纷的实质性化解,实现社会和谐。In the context of building a"big mediation"work pattern and putting the"non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism"in front of the background,administrative mediation is favored for its neutrality,professionalism and authority.However,its living space is squeezed by people's mediation and judicial mediation.There are also conflicts in the provisions of administrative mediation in the current legal texts of our country in terms of jurisdiction,scope of application,procedure setting,legal effect and so on,which affect the effectiveness of its system.In order to solve these problems,it is necessary to adopt a dual structure according to the different scope of application,and construct an administrative mediation system in line with China's national conditions,so as to realize the substantive resolution of disputes and achieve social harmony.

关 键 词:行政调解 文本冲突 二元结构 法治化 

分 类 号:D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象