知识产权客体兜底规范的内在关系及适用逻辑——以《民法典》第123条与《著作权法》第3条的适用为分析视角  

The Internal Relationship and Applicable Logic of Miscellaneous Norms on Intellectual Property Objects-From the Perspective of the Application of Article 123 of“the Civil Code and Article 3 of the Copyright Law”

作　　者：刘华[1] 李晓钰 LIU Hua;LI Xiaoyu(Institute of Intellectual Property,Central China Normal University,Wuhan Hubei 430079,China;Institute of China Rural Studies,Central China Normal University,Wuhan Hubei 430079,China)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学知识产权研究所,湖北武汉430079 [2]华中师范大学中国农村研究院,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第1期101-110,119,共11页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“网络化开放创新范式下企业知识产权市场化保护与价值转化法律机制研究”(21&ZD141)。

摘　　要：《民法典》对知识产权客体类型的立法取向秉持法定主义立场,而现行《著作权法》对作品类型的规范选择却经历了由“作品类型法定”到“作品类型开放”的重大转变,致使两法客观呈现权利客体类型开放与封闭的立法模式差异。实践中应揭示这种假性矛盾的本质,厘清私权部门种属概念间错位类比的逻辑误区,明确过渡性知识产权基本规范对各知识产权单行法特殊性问题的解释缺失,以《民法典》与《著作权法》之间互为“表里”的“隔代”调适关系为逻辑基础,支撑知识产权客体相关规范在司法适用中的实践展开。即以作品类型扩张的现实表现和法律解释经验为起点,以民事私权的价值理念为根基,秉持审慎开放、体系化解释和司法确认优先原则,在具体案件中依照知识产权权属定位、著作权权属定位、作品类型定位的逻辑层次,在权利客体兜底款项启用时严格把握相对开放的审慎裁判思路。The legislative orientation of China’s Civil Law on the types of intellectual property objects upholds the legalistic stance,while the current Copyright Law has undergone a significant transformation in the selection of work types from“legal work types”to“open work types”,resulting in an objective difference in the legislative models of open and closed object types of rights between the two laws.In practice,the essence of this false contradiction should be revealed,the logical misunderstanding of the misplaced analogy between the concepts of species in the private rights sector should be clarified,the lack of interpretation of the transitional basic norms of intellectual property rights on the particularity of individual intellectual property laws should be clarified,and the practice of relevant norms of intellectual property objects in judicial application should be implemented based on the“intergenerational”adjustment relationship between the Civil Code and the Copyright Law.That is to say,starting from the realistic performance of the expansion of the types of works and the experience of Statutory interpretation,based on the value concept of civil private rights,adhering to the principle of prudent openness,systematic interpretation and priority of judicial confirmation,in accordance with the logical level of the positioning of intellectual property rights,copyright rights and the positioning of the types of works in specific cases,we should strictly hold a relatively open and prudent judgment view when the right object is used to collect the funds.

关 键 词：民法典 著作权法 法定原则 作品类型开放 知识产权 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]