检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴汉东[1] 刘鑫[1] Wu Handong;Liu Xin(Center for Studies of Intellectual Property Rights,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,武汉430073
出 处:《科技与法律(中英文)》2024年第1期1-10,共10页Science Technology and Law(Chinese-English Version)
基 金:教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目“人工智能时代的知识产权制度发展研究”(22JD820030)。
摘 要:生成式人工智能的复合产品结构与自主运转功能造成了知识产权法律适用的难题与挑战。在复合产品结构下,知识产权法律难题源于生成式人工智能核心要素之算法与数据的知识产权保护问题;在自主运转功能下,知识产权法律挑战则呈现为生成式人工智能衍生内容的知识产权授权与确权问题。对此,应积极推进生成式人工智能场景下的知识产权法律变革,立足生成式人工智能核心要素与衍生内容,有针对性地展开知识产权制度创新,从而实现对生成式人工智能知识产权法律问题的合理回应。The composite product structure and autonomous operation function of generative artificial intelligence have created difficulties and challenges in the application of intellectual property laws.Under the structure of composite products,the legal challenges arise from the intellectual property protection issues of algorithms and data,which are the core elements of generative artificial intelligence;Under the autonomous operation function,the legal challenge presents as the issue of intellectual property authorization and confirmation of content derived from generative artificial intelligence.Therefore,we should actively promote the transformation of intellectual property rights in the context of generative artificial intelligence,based on the core elements and derivative content of generative artificial intelligence,and carry out targeted innovation of intellectual property systems,in order to achieve a reasonable response to legal is-sues related to intellectual property rights in generative artificial intelligence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15