论我国专利司法确权制度的构建  

On the Construction of Judicial Right Confirmation System of Patent in China

作　　者：朱飞宇 Zhu Feiyu(Civil and Commercial Law Department,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《科技与法律（中英文）》2024年第1期61-71,共11页Science Technology and Law（Chinese-English Version）

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“专利确权机制改革研究”(19AFX016)。

摘　　要：专利司法确权制度是专利确权制度中的一类,指法院在民事诉讼中对专利权效力纠纷予以审查的制度。构建我国专利司法确权制度,既可以弥补专利确权制度在功能实现方面的缺陷,又能够化解专利侵权诉讼在纠纷解决方面的困境。专利权的私权属性决定了专利权效力纠纷的民事属性,这不因专利行政部门的授权行为而发生改变。专利授权行为应当具有证明效力,即将专利授权行为作为证据对待,不宜适用公定力理论阐明。在制度构建的具体路径方面,建议在专利侵权诉讼中引入无效抗辩模式,并建立行政确权与司法确权的协调机制。Patent judicial confirmation system is a kind of patent confirmation system,which refers to the system in which the court examines the patent validity disputes in civil proceedings.The establishment of China's patent judicial right confirmation system can not only make up for the defects of the patent right confirmation system in the realization of functions,but also resolve the dilemma of patent infringement litigation in the settlement of disputes.The private property of patent right determines the civil property of patent validity dispute,which is not changed by the authoriza-tion of patent administration department.The act of patent authorization should have the effect of proof,that is,the act of patent authorization should be treated as evidence,and it is not suitable to apply the theory of certainty.In terms of the concrete path of system construction,it is suggested to introduce the invalid defense mode in patent infringement litigation and establish the coordination mechanism of administrative right confirmation and judicial right confirmation.

关 键 词：专利确权 司法确权制度 无效抗辩 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]