特定物精神损害赔偿研究  

A Research on Compensation for Moral Damages Related to Specific Objects with Personal Significance

作　　者：王金洋 Wang Jinyang(School of Law,People's Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038)

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学法学院,北京100038

出　　处：《嘉兴学院学报》2024年第1期118-123,共6页Journal of Jiaxing University

摘　　要：《民法典》第1183条第2款完善了我国精神损害赔偿制度,但由于立法者立法价值取向的偏差以及法条文字的模糊性,导致出现了具有人身意义的特定物范围不清、特定物精神损害赔偿主体资格的限缩化、主观方面立法价值取向有误以及对“严重精神损害”的认定缺乏参考标准等问题。须从法解释学的角度着手,明确特定物中“人身意义”的认定标准、特定物精神损害“严重性”的认定标准,完善特定物精神损害赔偿的主观要件。同时,有权主张特定物精神损害赔偿的主体并不一定是特定物所有权人,应当通过判断特定物上所承载人身利益,明确谁是《民法典》第1183条第2款的适格原告。Article 1183(2)of the Civil Code has improved the compensation system for moral damages in our country.However,due to the legislator's deviation from the legislative value orientation and the vagueness of the legal text,there are some problems,such as the unclear scope of specific objects with personal significance,the limitation of the subject of compensation for moral damages related to specific objects,the subjective defects in legislative value orientation and the lack of reference standards for the identification of“serious moral damage”.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify,from the perspective of legal hermeneutics,the criteria for determining the“personal significance”of a specific object,and the criteria for the“seriousness”of moral damage related to such an object,and to improve the subjective elements of the compensation for related mental damages.At the same time,the subject who has the right to claim compensation for moral damage related to a specific object is not necessarily the owner of the object.Instead,it is necessary to determine the eligible plaintiff under Article 1183(2)of the Civil Code by judging the personal interests carried by the specific object.

关 键 词：特定物 精神损害赔偿 人身利益保护 

分 类 号：D923.84[政治法律—民商法学]