倡议联盟形成中政策行动者的策略选择——基于西部陆海新通道的案例分析  

Policy Actors′Selection of Action Strategies in the Formation of Advocacy Coalition——A Case Analysis Based on the New Land-Sea Corridors for the Western Regions in China

作　　者：杨斌 马亮[1] YANG Bin;MA Liang(School of Public Administration and Policy,Renmin University of China,Bejing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学公共管理学院,北京100872

出　　处：《内蒙古大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第6期45-52,共8页Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目(项目批准号:72274203)。

摘　　要：倡议联盟框架认为,政策变迁是联盟互动和外部事件共同作用的结果。但是,现有文献运用倡议联盟框架解释政策变迁时,主要关注政策过程本身和倡议联盟之间的互动,忽视了倡议联盟内部政策行动者的集体行动。结合社会网络分析工具,以西部陆海新通道为案例,分析倡议联盟形成的微观基础。研究发现:倡议联盟的形成经历了发起、竞争、扩大和融合四个阶段,在这一过程中因为政策信念和政策资源的不同,政策行动者采取了牵头、借势、桥接、依附四种不同的行动策略,体现出不同政策行动者在倡议联盟中的地位差异。The Advocacy Coalition Framework(ACF)holds that policy change is the result of the interaction between advocacy coalitions and external events.However,existing literature has mainly focused on the policy process and the interaction between advocacy coalitions when using ACF to explain policy change,but overlooked the collective actions of policy actors within the advocacy coalitions.Using the social network analysis tools,taking the New Land-Sea Corridors for the Western Regions in China as a case,and analyzing the micro foundation of the formation of advocacy coalitions,it is found that the formation of the advocacy coalition goes through four stages:initiation,competition,expansion,and integration.Within such a process,due to differences in policy beliefs and policy resources,policy actors tend to adopt four different action strategies,including leading,leveraging,bridging and depending,which reflects the differentiation of policy actor statuses within the advocacy coalition.

关 键 词：政策变迁 倡议联盟 政策行动者 西部陆海新通道 微观基础 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]