后结构主义话语建构视角下国际反腐话语中“腐败”的含义探析——以透明国际CPI指数为案例  

The Meaning of“Corruption”in International Anti-Corruption Discourse from a Post-Structuralism Discourse Construction Perspective—A Case Study of Transparency International CPI Index

作　　者：李瑞文 Li Ruiwen(School of Discipline Inspection and Supervision,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学纪检监察学院,北京100088

出　　处：《西部学刊》2024年第1期29-32,共4页Journal of Western

摘　　要：当前学界关于“腐败”的定义和解释可以分为现代性理论范式、经济学理论范式和政治学理论范式三种。然而,这三种理论范式忽视了话语本身的工具性。以透明国际CPI指数为案例,基于福柯、拉克劳和墨菲的话语理论,引入后结构主义话语建构的分析框架,以其克服主流观点的局限性。后结构主义的话语分析框架抛开本质主义的观点,转而关注话语建构的过程。透明国际CPI指数实际上展现了第一世界国家和第三世界国家之间不对等的权力关系。这可以帮助解释CPI指数不能客观地反映一个国家或地区的真实廉洁水平的原因。At present,the definition and interpretation of“corruption”in academic circles can be divided into three paradigms:the paradigm of modernity theory,the paradigm of economic theory,and the paradigm of political theory.However,these three theoretical paradigms ignore the instrumentality of discourse itself.Therefore,based on the discourse theories of Foucault,Laclau,and Murphy,this paper introduces an analytical framework for post-structuralism discourse construction to overcome the limitations of the mainstream view.The post-structuralism discourse analysis framework abandons essentialist perspectives and focuses instead on the process of discourse construction.The Transparency International CPI actually shows the unequal power relations between the First World and Third World countries.This could help explain why the CPI index does not objectively reflect the true level of integrity of a country or region.

关 键 词：国际反腐败话语 后结构主义 透明国际 

分 类 号：D035.4[政治法律—政治学]