数字音乐环境下“录音制品法定许可”的检视与规制  

Review and Regulation of“Statutory License for Sound Recordings”in the Digital Music Environment

作　　者：冯艳艳[1] 李姿姣 Feng Yanyan;Li Zijiao(Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590)

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学,青岛266590

出　　处：《西部学刊》2024年第1期74-77,共4页Journal of Western

摘　　要：随着数字技术的出现,音乐产业呈现新业态,传统的音乐版权许可模式面临权利保护与传播效率冲突、价值失衡的困境。录音制品法定许可无疑是回应产业期待,顺应数字音乐背景的制度,但依然饱受争议。从本土现实出发,录音制品法定许可在产业实践的路径选择、促进文化多样性、利益平衡这三个方面体现出难以替代的正当性。在实践中,“录音制品法定许可”存在适用范围不明确、适用程序不完善、付酬规定过于僵化三个方面的问题。面对“录音制品法定许可”的现实问题,应当明确适用范围、删除“但书”条款,确立自由协商的许可定价模式,回应数字音乐产业期待。With the emergence of digital technology,the music industry presents a new business model,and the traditional music copyright licensing model faces the dilemma of conflict between rights protection and communication efficiency,and value imbalance.The statutory licensing of sound recordings is undoubtedly a system that responds to the industry’s expectations and is responsive to the digital music context,but it is still controversial.From the perspective of local realities,the statutory licensing of sound recordings reflects the irreplaceable legitimacy in three aspects:the choice of industrial practice,the promotion of cultural diversity,and the balance of interests.In practice,there are three problems in“statutory licensing of sound recordings”:unclear scope of application,imperfect application procedures,and overly rigid remuneration regulations.In the face of the practical dilemma of“statutory licensing of sound recordings”,the scope of application should be clarified,the“proviso”clause should be deleted,and a freely negotiated licensing pricing model should be established to respond to the expectations of the digital music industry.

关 键 词：数字音乐 录音制品 法定许可 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]