从物权保护角度论间接占有及间接占有人侵害物权的责任  

On the Indirect Possession and Indirect Possessor’s Liability for Infringement on Property Rights from the Perspective of Property Rights Protection

作　　者：张国珍 Zhang Guozhen(Zhejiang Jiaruicheng Law Firm,Wenzhou 325014)

机构地区：[1]浙江嘉瑞成律师事务所,温州325014

出　　处：《西部学刊》2024年第1期82-88,共7页Journal of Western

摘　　要：通说认为,间接占有是一种事实,以占有媒介意思为构成要件。通过分析间接占有的历史渊源、价值取向、制度功能,认为间接占有并不以占有媒介意思为构成要件。另外,人们在讨论物权保护时,往往只从被占有物的物权出发考虑如何保护物权,但从间接占有的事实出发分析,在间接占有情形下,间接占有人既可能会损害其间接占有的物的物权,也可能会损害间接占有物之外的物的物权。但间接占有人究竟应承担怎样的侵权责任,则根据不同的物权保护制度和间接占有人的主观过错情况而有所不同。The general theory holds that indirect possession is a fact,and indirect possession is constituted by the meaning of the possession medium.By analyzing the historical origin,value orientation and institutional function of indirect possession,this paper argues that indirect possession does not take the meaning of possession medium as the constituent element.In addition,when people discuss the protection of property rights,they often only consider how to protect property rights from the perspective of the property rights of the possessed things,but this article analyzes from the fact of indirect possession and argues that in the case of indirect possession,the indirect possessor may damage the property rights of the things he indirectly occupies,and may also damage the property rights of things other than the indirect possession.However,what kind of tort liability the indirect occupier should bear varies according to different property rights protection systems and the subjective fault of the indirect occupier.

关 键 词：物权保护 间接占有 间接占有人 侵害物权 责任 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]