论让与担保的性质  

On the Nature of the Transferring Guarantee

作　　者：李宜彬 Li Yibin(Heilongjiang University,Harbin 150080)

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学,哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《西部学刊》2024年第2期104-107,共4页Journal of Western

摘　　要：2020年5月,在我国正式进入“民法典时期”的大背景下,让与担保的性质问题引发热议。究其原因是法律规定与实务操作不统一。在民商事交易活动中,让与担保被广泛使用,若依据物权法定原则,会致使很多涉及让与担保的行为被认定为无效。国家出台了《九民纪要》,在实务中认可了其担保权。通过参考德国、日本的担保法构成,对比分析学界对让与担保性质的两大学说(即所有权构造说和担保权构造说),阐述司法裁判对涉及让与担保的性质认定,明确让与担保的性质造成的实务难题,提出作扩张解释的应对方法。In May 2020,under the background of China’s“Civil Code Period”,the nature of the transferring guarantee caused a heated discussion.The reason for this is the inconsistence between legal provisions and practical operations.In civil and commercial transactions,the transferring guarantee is widely used and if the numerus clausus is applied,many acts involving the transferring guarantee will be recognized as invalid.The State has issued The Summaries of the National Conference for Work of Courts on the Trial of Civil and Commercial Cases which in practice recognizes the security rights.By referring to the composition of the security laws of Germany and Japan,and by comparing and analyzing the two theories of the nature of the transferring guarantee(i.e.,the ownership construction theory and the security right construction theory),this paper elaborates the judicial determination of the nature of the transferring guarantee and clarifies the practical difficulties caused by it,and suggests to deal with it through extensive interpretation.

关 键 词：让与担保 让与担保性质 物权法定 债权担保 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]