检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈博涵 Chen Bohan
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院民族文学研究所,北京100732
出 处:《延边大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第1期83-91,143,144,共11页Journal of Yanbian University:Social Science Edition
基 金:中国社会科学院亚洲研究中心课题(2021YYZX010)。
摘 要:李氏朝鲜史学家围绕《牛山答问》展开的对高丽士人吉再的气节争议,因“辛朝”问题,牵涉到《高丽史》中的“辛王之辨”。这一辩论表现为两种史学观念的交锋,即认同官修史书的人与反对官方叙事者的争论。追溯“辛王之辨”的形成可知,它是政权鼎革的产物,是以权臣李成桂为中心的政治集团利用宫廷伦理危机,在高丽末期发起的一场禑、昌二王为“异姓”之王的舆论斗争,并最终形成《高丽史》的官方叙事。客观认识“辛王之辨”,对把握高丽末期士人的言行出处具有重要意义。The controversy about Gil Jae’s integrity,which was carried out by Korean historians of Lee Dynasty,is related to the“debate on the orthodoxy of King Sin”in History of Goryeo because of the issue of“Sin Dynasty”.The debate is the clash of two historical ideas,i.e.those who agreed with the official history records and those who opposed the official narrators.Tracing back to the origin of the debate,it can be found that the debate was the product of the political revolution and a battle of public opinion initiated by the political group with the powerful minister Yi Seong-gye as the core.By taking advantage of the royal ethical crisis at the end of the Goryeo Dynasty,the official narrative of History of Goryeo finally accomplished.The objective understanding of the debate is of great significance to the research on the scholars’behavior in the late Goryeo Dynasty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33