检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘乐 Liu Le
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院亚太与全球战略研究院
出 处:《南亚研究》2023年第4期1-24,153,共25页South Asian Studies
基 金:2023年度中国社会科学院智库基础研究项目“‘一带一路’高质量发展面临的负面舆论挑战及应对研究”(项目编号:23ZKJC116)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:十年来,中巴经济走廊建设在微观、中观和宏观层面取得了一系列的突出进展和重要成就,同时也遭到各种批评。具体而言,对于中巴经济走廊建设的批评及其原因主要集中在四个方面:基于狭隘政治利益强加的“批评”;源于错误认知定位产生的批评;由于国内政治因素影响惹来的批评;对于项目建设运营过程做出的批评。以此为镜鉴,为了推动共建“一带一路”高质量发展,有关各方需进一步明确“一带一路”的外延,注重做好“一带一路”建设过程中的利益相关者管理,以及共同构建“一带一路”的建设成效评价体系。Over the past decade,remarkable progress has been made towards the development of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor(CPEC)at both the micro,meso and macro levels,with several milestones having been achieved.At the same time,CPEC has also been subject to significant criticism.Specifically,four general types of criticism have been targeted at CPEC:criticism based on narrow political interests;criticism based on misconceptions or a failure to properly understand the positioning of the platform;criticism prompted by domestic political factors;and criticism directed towards the construction or operation of CPEC projects.Key lessons learned from reviewing CPEC include:(1)in order to promote high-quality Belt and Road cooperation,relevant parties need to clarify the scope of the BRI;(2)parties also need to pay careful attention to effective stakeholder management throughout the progress of constructing BRI projects;(3)they should jointly establish an evaluation framework for appraising the achievements of the BRI.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112