检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘培[1] 叶环瑞 Liu Pei;Ye Huanrui
机构地区:[1]中国科学技术大学人文与社会科学学院科技史与科技考古系
出 处:《南亚研究》2023年第4期109-129,156,157,共23页South Asian Studies
摘 要:几十年来国际上始终存在着针对中巴正常核合作关系的不和谐声音。本文认为国际学界对于中巴核关系误读的主要“论据”来自国外媒体和政府的无端指控,以冷战零和思维下传统势力均衡的角度为“逻辑”进行解读,其“本质”是西方国家对华舆论战的一个重要环节。本文通过梳理20世纪50年代至70年代西方国家对巴基斯坦核技术的援助与限制、80年代起中巴开展核电合作的历史过程,认为西方国家的偏见和双重标准以及中国对核不扩散机制态度的演变是产生误读现象的主要原因。For several decades,significant discord has continued within the international research community when it comes to normal nuclear cooperation between China and Pakistan.This article contends that the primary “evidence”that has led international scholars to misunderstand China-Pakistan nuclear ties is in reality baseless accusations made by foreign media and governments.As a means of supporting these baseless claims made by foreign media and governments,Cold War and zero-sum thinking is used to interpret the so-called “logic”behind the claims against the backdrop of traditional power structures.Fundamentally,this is one element of the information warfare that Western countries use against China.This article examines the history of Western assistance to and restrictions on Pakistan's nuclear technology from the 1950sto the 1970s,and the history of nuclear cooperation between China and Pakistan starting from the beginning of the 1980s.It argues that Western bias,double standards,and the evolving attitude of China towards the nuclear nonproliferation mechanism are the main reasons that the relationship has been misinterpreted.
分 类 号:D815.2[政治法律—国际关系] D822.335.3[政治法律—政治学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.138.21