论行政主体理论的本土化建构  

On the Localization Construction of Administratiive Subiect Theory

作　　者：朱世海[1] 朱应平[2] Zhu Shihai;Zhu Yingping

机构地区：[1]澳门科技大学法学院,中国澳门 [2]华东政法大学法学院

出　　处：《学术前沿》2023年第24期80-89,共10页Frontiers

基　　金：澳门科技大学研究基金“我国行政主体理论的完善”的阶段性成果,项目编号:FRG-22-099-FL。

摘　　要：我国学界关于行政主体理论的研究成果颇丰,但在我国是否移植国外分权行政主体理论、政府职能部门是否继续作为行政主体等问题上仍存在分歧,尚未形成共识。我国不宜移植国外分权行政主体理论,原因在于我国的国家结构形式、政党政治与西方国家存在巨大差异,而且我国也没有国家法人学说。当然,我国目前的行政主体理论有待完善,面临本土化建构的重大任务。有鉴于此,政府职能部门的行政主体资格应继续保留,但应取消政府职能部门派出机构的行政主体资格;基于公权不可处分原则,行政法规和规章原则上不应授予社会组织行政权。There are plenty of research results on the theory of administrative subject in Chinese academic circles.Yet,there is still no consensus on whether to transplant the foreign theory of decentralized administrative subject and whether government departments should continue to be administrative subject.It is not appropriate for China to transplant the theory of decentralized administrative subject from abroad because there are huge differences between China and Western countries'state structure and party politics.What's more,there is no doctrine of national legal person in China.Of cause,China's current theory of the administrative subject needs to be improved,and it faces the huge task of localization and construction.Given this,the administrative subject status of government departments should be retained,but the administrative subject status of agencies dispatched by government departments should be abolished.Based on the principle of the non-disposability of public power,administrative laws,and regulations should not,in principle,grant administrative power to social organizations.

关 键 词：行政主体理论 本土化建构 行政主体制度 分权行政主体理论 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]