“致人死伤”型结果加重犯归责问题的类型化展开  

Typological Discussion on the Liability of Aggregated Consequential Offense“Causing Death or Injury”

作　　者：沈晓白 Shen Xiaobai

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院

出　　处：《中国社会科学院大学学报》2023年第12期126-141,152,共17页Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

摘　　要：危险现实化理论重视对行为本身危险内容的判断以及介入因素与实行行为之间的规范关联,将其引入结果加重犯的归责判断中有助于解决在存在介入因素时死伤结果的归责难题。按照实行行为内含的特殊危险现实化为死伤结果的路径不同,可将归责的类型分为直接实现型和间接实现型。直接实现型在客观层面上要求实行行为中的高度危险是死伤结果的决定性原因,介入因素对因果流程没有实质性影响,在主观层面上只要求对实行行为的高度危险具有预见可能性。在间接实现型中,实行行为造成诱发介入因素的危险状态,并且这一状态与介入因素之间具有一般性、类型性的关联,在主观层面上要求行为人对介入因素具有预见可能性。Danger's realization theory attaches great importance to the judgment of the dangerous content of the behavior itself and the normative relationship between the intervening factors and the perpetrating act.Introducing it into the judgment of responsibility for aggravated consequence crimes helps to solve the complex problem of responsibility for death and injury results when there arei nitervening factors.According to the different paths through which the special danger inherent in the perpetrating act becomes aggravated results,attributable responsibility can be divided into two types:direct realization and indirect realization.The direct realization objectively requires that the high risk in the behavior is the decisive cause of the deaths and injuries,and the intervening factors have no substantial impact on the causal process.Therefore,at the subjective level,it only requires the possibility of predicting the high risk of the behavior.In the indirect realization,the perpetrating act will cause a dangerous state that induces intervening factors,and there is a general and typological correlation between this state and the intervening factors,which requires,at the subjective level,the actor to have the foreseeability of the intervening factors.

关 键 词：结果加重犯 危险现实化 归责限定 预见可能性 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]