检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁煌[1] 李呈阳 Ding Huang;Li Chengyang(Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《贵州财经大学学报》2023年第6期44-50,共7页Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
摘 要:我国比较典型的政府工程管理体制有分散管理体制、市场化代建体制及集中管理体制。近年来,集中管理体制在各地的广泛实践引起了学界较多讨论,但这些研究很少对集中管理体制的运作细节进行研究并考察其优势和风险。通过对集中管理体制运作实际的深入分析,指出:相较于分散管理体制和市场化代建体制,集中管理体制具有明显的效率优势、专业优势和规模优势,但也面临着廉政风险防控、建设与需求脱节、人员编制刚性和激励不足的风险。因此,需要在体制机制上不断进行改革创新,从而更好地发挥其制度优势,防范潜在的风险。At present,the typical public works management systems in our country are decentralized management system,market-oriented construction agent system and centralized management system.In recent years,the extensive practice of centralized management system has aroused much discussion in academic circles,but these studies rarely go into the operational details of centralized management system to examine its advantages and risks.Based on an in-depth analysis of the actual operation of the centralized management system,this paper proposes that compared with the decentralized management system and the market-oriented construction agent system,the centralized management system has obvious advantages in efficiency,specialty and scale,at the same time,it is faced with the risks of preventing and controlling the risks of clean government,disconnection between construction and demand,rigidity of personnel establishment and insufficient motivation.It is necessary to carry on the reform and innovation in the institutional mechanism,so as to give full play to its institutional advantages and guard against potential risks.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63