“一带一路”国内国际研究的文献计量对比分析与政策建议  

Comparative analysis of the domestic and international study of“The Belt and Road”:A bibliometric analysis

作　　者：陶凤鸣[1] 杨佳[2] 张柳柳 TAO Fengming;YANG Jia;ZHANG Liuliu(School of Management Science and Real Estate,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,P.R.China;College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]重庆大学管理科学与房地产学院,重庆400044 [2]重庆大学机械与运载工程学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第6期85-99,共15页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：重庆大学中央高校基本科研业务费人文社科类项目“‘一带一路’背景下内陆城市物流业绿色发展研究”(2020CDJSK03XK13);国家社会科学基金项目“新发展格局下城乡生鲜冷链物流高质量发展机制与路径研究”(21BGL127)。

摘　　要：“一带一路”是我国根据国内外形势统筹两个大局作出的重要发展倡议,旨在鼓励全球价值链的延伸,促进区域经济发展。自2013年提出以来,就受到了国内外学者的广泛关注,产生了内容丰富、见解独到的学术成果。文章对比分析了“一带一路”国内国际研究在发文量、合作网络、研究内容、研究趋势等方面的差异,以期为该领域的研究提供全面的文献计量分析,并由此提出相关政策建议。为此,分别从CNKI数据库和WoS核心合集获取2013年10月1日至2020年10月31日期间国内及国际“一带一路”研究论文数据。为保证高质量的可视化结果,排除了会议摘要、报纸及书评等不相关的文献,对最终符合纳入标准文献数据的15 916篇CNKI研究文献和1 265篇Web of Science核心合集文献用CiteSpace软件进行合作网络分析和关键词共现网络分析。研究发现,在作者合作网络中,国内研究的作者合作关系较弱,主要围绕中国与沿线国家之间的合作关系展开研究;国际研究的作者之间合作关系稍强,主要围绕海上丝绸之路的港口运输网络、中国国内外发展局势等方面展开研究。在机构合作网络中,国内和国际的研究机构都具有较多的合作关系。其中,国内发文量居前四的机构分别为中国社会科学院、中国人民大学、吉林大学和北京大学;国际发文量居前四的机构分别为中国科学院、中国科学院大学、浙江大学和新加坡国立大学。在国家合作网络中,中国、俄罗斯、韩国和加拿大最早关注“一带一路”研究;发文量较多的国家分别是中国、美国、俄罗斯、英国等;与其他国家合作次数最多的国家分别是瑞士、意大利、斯里兰卡和澳大利亚。在研究范围方面,2015年该主题的关键词开始涉及各个研究领域,如“贸易便利化”“区域经济”“地缘政治”等;随着时间的推移,关键词还涉及“全球治理”s,newspaper and book reviews were excluded.And finally,15916 research literatures derived from CNKI and 1265 articles from Web of Science Core Collection,published from October 1st,2013 to October 31st,2020 were analyzed by the CiteSpace with regards to cooperation network and keyword co-occurrence network.The findings of this paper are as the followings.(1)In the author cooperation network,the domestic authors have a weak cooperation relationship,and mainly focused on the cooperation relationship between China and the countries along the“Belt and Road”;the oversea authors have a slightly stronger cooperation relationship with each other,and mainly focused on the port transportation network of the Maritime Silk Road and the development situation of China at home and abroad.(2)In the institutional cooperation network,both domestic and international research institutions have more cooperative relationships.The top four domestic institutions of publication number are Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Renmin University of China,Jilin University and Peking University;and the top four international institutions of publication number are Chinese Academy of Sciences,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Zhejiang University and National University of Singapore.(3)In the national cooperation network,China,Russia,South Korea and Canada are the countries with the earliest attention to the“Belt and Road”research;the countries with higher publications are China,USA,Russia,the United Kingdom,etc.;Switzerland,Italy,Sri Lanka and Australia are the most frequent cooperation with other countries.(4)In terms of research scope,the key words of the topic in 2015 began to cover various research areas,involving“trade facilitation”,“regional economy”,“geopolitics”,etc.As time goes by,the keywords also cover“global governance”,“cultural industries”,“energy consumption”,etc.Relatively speaking,the scope of domestic research is broader,involving“a community with a shared future for mankind”,“openin

关 键 词：“一带一路” 文献计量分析 CITESPACE 对比分析 

分 类 号：F125[经济管理—世界经济]