检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁洁兰[1] 李杰 吴登生 常志军 Ding Jielan;Li Jie;Wu Dengsheng;Chang Zhijun(National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;Department of Information Resources Management,School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;Institutes of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院文献情报中心,北京100190 [2]中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系,北京100190 [3]中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京100190
出 处:《科学观察》2023年第6期44-56,共13页Science Focus
摘 要:[目的/意义]通过系统分析中国科学院在“十二五”与“十三五”期间的产出态势,揭示其在国际和国内舞台上的产出表现,以期为未来“十四五”的相关产出评价政策提供参考。[方法/过程]从科研产出视角出发,以WOS论文为数据基础,运用文献计量方法分析“十二五”与“十三五”时期中国科学院在研究规模、学术影响力、高被引论文、重要期刊发文、合作论文、发文署名位置等维度的产出表现,并选取哈佛大学、德国马普学会、清华大学、北京大学作为对标机构来分析中国科学院的国际和国内产出竞争力。[结果/结论]中国科学院在论文产出上具有较强的规模优势,但是学术影响力、高被引论文和重要期刊论文产出效率、国际合作程度与产业合作程度相比国内外领先对标机构均存在一定差距,但差距在不断缩小;相比“十二五”时期,“十三五”时期中国科学院在上述维度均有较快增长但增长幅度低于清华大学,与北京大学相差无几,高于两个国际对标机构。从研究主题分布来看,中国科学院偏重物质科学和工程领域的相关主题。[Objective/Significance]In order to systematically analyze the output situation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS)during the 12th and 13th Five-Year Plan periods,and reveal its output performance in international and domestic comparisons,in order to provide reference for the relevant output evaluation policies of the 14th Five-Year Plan in the future.[Method/Process]From a perspective of research output,based on Web of Science(WOS)papers,this paper uses bibliometric method to analyze the output performance of CAS in the dimensions of research volume,academic impact,highly cited papers,papers from important journals,collaboration papers,and authorship positions during the"12th Five Year Plan"and"13th Five Year Plan"periods,and selects Harvard University,German Max Planck Institute,Tsinghua University and Peking University as benchmarking agencies,in order to reveal the competitiveness of CAS in international and domestic comparisons.[Results/Conclusions]The research conclusions show that CAS has a strong scale advantage in the output of papers,but there is a certain gap between the academic impact,the output efficiency of highly cited papers and papers from important journal,the degree of international collaboration and the degree of industrial collaboration between CAS and the above leading benchmarking institutions;During the"13th Five Year Plan"period,compared with the"12th Five Year Plan"period,CAS has a rapid growth in the above dimensions,but the growth rate is lower than that of Tsinghua University,similar to that of Peking University,and higher than the two international benchmarking institutions.As for the distribution of research topics,CAS lays particular emphasis on relevant topics in the field of Physical Sciences and Engineering.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28