秸秆收储运模式对运输成本的影响  

Impact of Straw Collecting,Storage and Transportation Modes on Transportation Costs

作　　者：田亚超 李森 晋强[2] TIAN Yachao;LI Sen;JIN Qiang(Xinjiang Huli Jiayuan Environmental Protection Technology Co.,Ltd.,Urumqi 830063,Xinjiang,China;College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering,Xinjiang Agricultural University,Urumqi 830052,Xinjiang,China)

机构地区：[1]新疆互力佳源环保科技有限公司,新疆乌鲁木齐830063 [2]新疆农业大学水利与土木工程学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830052

出　　处：《能源与节能》2024年第1期32-36,共5页Energy and Energy Conservation

基　　金：新疆互力佳源环保科技有限公司科技项目“双碳背景下生物质燃料替代化石能源在矿渣立磨应用的研究”(HLJY2022KY0530A-01)。

摘　　要：以乌鲁木齐市为例,选取了10个储运点,分析不同秸秆收储运模式的特点,寻找经济可行的收储运模式,提升秸秆生物质的利用率。结果表明:秸秆运输成本占秸秆生物质燃料成本的比例较大;模式一适用于秸秆储存量不大、运输距离较近的收储运点;模式二对距离较远、储量小的收储运点较为适合;模式三适用于储量大的收储运点,收集快,运输距离短。3种模式各有利弊,应针对不同的地点选用最合适的方法。储量小,选择模式一;储量大,选择模式三;距离远,选择模式二。Taking Urumqi City as an example,10 storage and transportation points were selected to analyze the characteristics of different straw collecting,storage and transportation modes,and to find economically feasible collecting,storage and transportation modes to improve the utilization rate of straw biomass.The results show that the transportation cost of straw accounts for a large proportion of the cost of straw biomass fuel;mode 1 is suitable for collecting,storage,and transportation points with small straw storage capacity and close transportation distance;mode 2 is more suitable for collecting,storage and transportation points that are far away and have small reserves;mode 3 is suitable for storage and transportation points with large reserves,with fast collection and short transportation distance.Each of the three modes has its own advantages and disadvantages,and the most suitable method should be selected for different locations.For low reserve,select mode 1;for large reserves,select mode 3;for long distance,select mode 2.

关 键 词：生物质秸秆 秸秆收储运 收储运模式 运输成本 

分 类 号：TK6[动力工程及工程热物理—生物能]