比较政治学视野中的全过程人民民主优越性  

The Superiority of the Whole Process People’s Democracy from the Comparative Perspective of Politics

作　　者：王欣[1] WANG Xin(School of Marxism,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学马克思主义学院,北京100872

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第12期34-39,共6页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：卢梭的民主政治思想作为经典民主理论的代表具有一定的合理内容,不过这一具有实质性内容的民主政治构想因其缺乏实践性而不能为发展中国特色社会主义民主政治提供范本。在学界占主流地位的西方自由主义民主和以哈贝马斯为代表的协商民因其在实践层面的缺陷也未能提供相应的参考。而马克思基于普选权对未来社会的政治构想亦受当时实践维度的局限不能为今天提供完整的指导。而全过程人民民主作为人类政治文明新形态回应了新时代发展中国特色社会主义民主政治的实践要求,是中国在实践中确立的实质民主之建设方案。其优越性也在这种比较的视域中得以显现。Rousseau’s democratic political thought,as the representative of classical democratic theory,has certain reasonable content.However,this idea of democratic politics with substantial content cannot provide a model for the development of democratic politics in socialism with Chinese characteristics because of its lack of practicality.Western liberal democracy and deliberative democracy represented by Habermas,which are the mainstream in academic circles,have failed to provide corresponding reference because of their defects in practice.However,Marx’s political conception of the future society based on universal suffrage still cannot provide complete practical guidance because of the lack of its practical dimension in the today.The whole-process people’s democracy,as a new form of human political civilization,responds to the practical requirements of developing socialism democratic politicswith Chinese characteristics in the new era,and it is the construction plan of substantive democracy established by China in practice.Its superiority also can be revealed in this comparative perspective.

关 键 词：马克思 西方民主 全过程人民民主 实践 

分 类 号：A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学] D082[政治法律—政治学] D621