检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:管亚冰 GUAN Ya-bing(Law School of Jilin University,Changchun 130015,China)
出 处:《天水行政学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第1期99-104,共6页Journal of Tianshui College of Administration
摘 要:《中华人民共和国立法法》第八十二条第四款规定,上位法有明确规定的,地方性法规一般不作重复规定,这是一项重要的立法原则,需要进一步明确其内涵。但由于“一般不重复上位法”规定的较为模糊,地方立法规范数量众多,但并没有实现该原则的细化,目前的立法和司法程序也没有对重复立法的情形提供有效的审查和监督机制,导致地方立法对上位法的“复制粘贴”行为层出不穷。这一问题的解决需要总结地方经验,更新立法原则,以地方性法规的方式明晰“合理重复”的内涵和边界,并在立法程序上作出否定性评价。The Legislative Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that if the superior law is clearly prescribed,the local regulations generally do not repeat the provisions.This is an important legislative principle and needs to further clarify its connotation.However,due to the vague provisions of the“general non-repetition of the superior law”,and the refinement of the principle is not realized,though the number of local legislative norms is large.The current legislative and judicial procedures also do not provide an effective review and supervision mecha-nism for the situation,so the“copy and paste”behavior of the superior law is endless.It is necessary to summarize local experience,update legislative principles,clarify the connotation and boundary of“reasonable repetition”in the form of local regulations,and make a negative evaluation on the legislative process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117