检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱正兴 雷庆关 杨本水 ZHU Zhengxing;LEI Qingguan;YANG Benshui(School of Civil Engineering,Anhui Jianzhu University,Hefei Anhui 230601)
机构地区:[1]安徽建筑大学土木工程学院,安徽合肥230601
出 处:《湖北理工学院学报》2024年第1期37-40,共4页Journal of Hubei Polytechnic University
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(项目编号:51774007,51274007)。
摘 要:结合合肥地区的城市轨道交通工程实例的基础沉降实测资料,采用不同计算方法进行天然地基地下建筑基础沉降量预测计算,即基于三点法、Peck公式预测对合肥市肥东地区粘性土地基的沉降进行了研究。结果表明,实际情况下三点法预测的沉降量往往比Peck法预测的沉降量更具有参考性。文章可以为粘性土地基处理提供依据,为按照变形控制原则进行地基基础设计提供借鉴。Combined with the measured data of foundation settlement of urban rail transit project in Hefei area,different calculation methods are used to predict foundation settlement of natural foundation underground building.Based on the three-point method and Peck formula prediction,this paper studies the settlement of cohesive soil foundation in Feidong District,Hefei City.The results shows that the settlements predicted by three-point method are often more referential than those predicted by Peck method.The paper can provide a part of basis for cohesive soil foundation treatment and reference for foundation design according to deformation control principle.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33