我国涉外合同法律选择中法院地法的谦抑适用  

The Modest Application of the Law of the Forum in the Choice of Law for Foreign-Related Contract in China

作　　者：肖芳[1] Xiao Fang

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2024年第1期192-200,F0003,共10页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(20YJA820025)“国际投资仲裁的司法监督与保障研究”。

摘　　要：在涉外合同涉及法院地公共利益的时候,法院可以通过适用单边冲突规范等几种不同的途径,排除外国法的适用而适用法院地法。在涉外合同法律适用中我国司法机关应对法院地法的适用保持谦抑,这是营造我国市场化、法治化、国际化营商环境的要求。具体来说,直接适用的法规范应仅限于我国法律和行政法规中的国际强制性规范,且应仅直接适用于合同的某个具体方面,其所涉合同应该与法院地有足够的联系;相关单边冲突规范应该只适用于属于其“范围”之内的法律关系;在涉外合同的法律适用领域不应适用法律规避制度;我国司法机关应该继续坚持对公共秩序保留制度的谨慎态度。When a foreign-related contract involves the public interests of the forum,the court can exclude the appli-cation of foreign law and apply the law of the forum by applying unilateral conflict rules and other different methods.In choosing applicable law to foreign-related contracts,the Chinese courts should keep the modest application of the law of the forum,which is a requirement for creating a market-oriented,law-based and international business environment in China.Specifically,the rules of loi d'application immediate should be limited to the international mandatory rules in Chi-nese laws and administrative regulations,and it should only be directly applicable to a specific aspect of the contract,and the contract involved should have sufficient contact with the forum.Relevant unilateral conflict rule should only be applied to legal relations within its""category";the evasion of law regime should not be applied in the field of choice of law for for-eign-related contracts;Chinese courts should continue to keep cautious in applying the public order reservation regime.

关 键 词：涉外合同 营商环境 公共利益 直接适用的法 强制性规范 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]