妨害兴奋剂管理罪行为要件的具体展开  

Specific Research of Behavior in Crime of Interfering with the Control of Stimulants

作　　者：卜元钏 BU Yuanchuan(College of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《湖北体育科技》2024年第1期36-40,共5页Hubei Sports Science

摘　　要：《刑法修正案(十一)》增设了妨害兴奋剂管理罪,其行为要件的解释不明使得该罪存在成为象征性立法的风险,因此对其进行规范化分析尤为必要。妨害兴奋剂管理罪的保护法益是国内、国际重大体育竞赛的公平性与运动员的身心健康。在此前提下,应当将立法所列举的行为要件分为“促使型”“提供型”“推使型”3种,根据行为特征与违法性程度的不同分别进行内涵与外延的界定以及实质可罚性的判断,为司法中的实际适用提供理论支持。The amendment to the Criminal Law,known as Amendment XI,added the Crime of Interfering with the Control of Stimulants.The unclear interpretation of its behavioral elements makes this crime have the risk of becoming symbolic legislation,so it is particularly necessary to carry out a standardized analysis.The legal interests protected by the crime of interfering with the administration of doping are the fairness of major domestic and international sports competitions and the physical and mental health of athletes.Under this premise,the behavioral elements listed by the legislation should be divided into three types,promoting type,providing type and pushing type.According to the different behavioral characteristics and the degree of infringement of legal interests,the definition of connotation and extension and the judgment of substantive punishability should be carried out respectively,so as to provide theoretical support for the actual application in judicature.

关 键 词：妨害兴奋剂管理罪 保护法益 行为特征 

分 类 号：G812.48[文化科学—体育学]