检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭卫星 PENG Wei-xing(CCCC Construction Group Co.Ltd.,Beijing 100022,China)
出 处:《工程建设与设计》2024年第1期189-192,共4页Construction & Design for Engineering
摘 要:探讨两种方法在测定相同混凝土结构的强度时结果产生差异的原因,对两种方法做对比分析,以明确两种方法的应用优势和不足,在此基础上重点探讨钻芯修正回弹法的应用要点。结果表明,在混凝土强度检测中妥善应用钻芯修正回弹法,可以保证测定结果的可靠性,为工程质量管控提供依据。Core-drilling method and rebound method are common methods in concrete strength testing.Combining with engineering examples,this paper discusses the reasons for the differences in the results of the two methods in the determination of the same concrete structure,and makes a comparative analysis of the two methods to clarify the application advantages and disadvantages of the two methods.On this basis,it focuses on the application points of the core-drilling modified rebound method.The results show that proper application of the drill coremodified rebound method in concrete strength testing can ensure the reliability of the measured results and provide a basis for engineering quality control.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.209.231