检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄慧 周涛[2] 朱正 马怡 陈丽 段婉平 李玲[4] HUANG Hui;ZHOU Tao;ZHU Zheng;MA Yi;CHEN Li;DUAN Wanping;LI Ling(Wuhu Blood Center,Wuhu 241002,China;Huainan Blood Center;Xuancheng Blood Center;The Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu)
机构地区:[1]芜湖市中心血站,安徽芜湖241002 [2]淮南市中心血站 [3]宣城市中心血站 [4]成都市第三人民医院
出 处:《中国输血杂志》2024年第1期37-42,共6页Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
基 金:芜湖市“十四五”医学重点培育输血技术专科资金。
摘 要:目的以多中心HIV残余风险研究为基础,分析不同HIV检测策略的成本与效果,为血站采用适宜的HIV检测策略提供参考依据。方法依据安徽省3家血站献血者HIV检测、确认情况,估算HIV不同检测方法的残余风险。建立决策树模型,分析国内现行政策下的3种不同检测策略的成本效果差异。结果本研究调查地区,抗-HIV-1+2 ELISA、HIV Ag/Ab1+2 ELISA、ELISA+NAT技术的残余风险分别为1.17×10^(-6)、0.84×10^(-6)、0.59×10^(-6);经决策树模型分析,在无核酸检测时,HIV Ag/Ab1+2 ELISA较抗-HIV-1+2 ELISA方案更具成本效果优势,但加上1遍NAT后,HIV Ag/Ab1+2 ELISA的优势消失;HIV试剂成本、HIV治疗成本以及假阳性报废成本,是模型的敏感因素。结论本研究调查地区,采用1遍抗HIV-1+2 ELISA加1遍NAT方案,具有成本效果优势。血站在决定采用何种HIV检测策略前,需对使用的酶免试剂,进行确认和评估,在保证灵敏度的前提下,综合考虑关键因素为试剂成本及试剂假阳性率。Objective To analyze the cost and effectiveness of different HIV screening strategies based on multicenter HIV residual risk study,so as to provide reference for blood centers to adopt appropriate HIV testing strategies.Methods According to the HIV screening and confirmation of blood donors in three blood centers in Anhui Province,the residual risk of different HIV screening strategies was estimated.A decision tree model was established to analyze the cost-effectiveness differences of three different screening strategies under current domestic policies.Results The residual risk of anti-HIV-1+2 ELISA,HIV Ag/Ab1+2 ELISA and ELISA+NAT were 1.17×10^(-6),0.84×10^(-6)and 0.59×10^(-6),respectively.According to decision tree model analysis,HIV Ag/Ab1+2 ELISA had a cost-effectiveness advantage over anti-HIV 1+2 ELISA when there was no NAT,but the advantage of HIV Ag/Ab1+2 ELISA disappeared when there was one NAT.The cost of HIV reagents,the cost of HIV treatment and the cost of false positive discarding were sensitive factors of the model.Conclusion In this area,one anti-HIV 1+2 ELISA combined with one NAT has a cost-effectiveness advantage.Blood centers need to confirm and evaluate the ELISA reagents used before conducting HIV screening.Under the premise of ensuring sensitivity,reagent cost and reagent false positive rate are the key factors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.141.175