检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王彩[1] 吴雪青 Wang Cai;Wu Xueqing(Shaoxing Vocational&Technical College,Shaoxing,312000)
机构地区:[1]绍兴职业技术学院,绍兴312000
出 处:《分子植物育种》2024年第2期459-464,共6页Molecular Plant Breeding
基 金:浙江省教育厅访问工程师“校企合作项目”(FG2022189)资助。
摘 要:本研究深入探讨了生物育种研发支出的会计选择,具体研究了资本化和费用化这两种不同的会计方法。本研究详细分析了这两种方法的优势和劣势,以及它们对公司、投资者和决策者的潜在影响。资本化有助于提高资产负债表的质量,但可能带来更多复杂性和税务问题。而费用化有助于提升短期盈利和现金流,但可能导致长期创新潜力被忽视。本研究还考察了公司规模和类型、法规和行业标准,以及研发项目性质和可量化性等多个因素对会计选择的影响。本研究突出了监管机构的角色,提出政策建议和未来研究方向,以协助公司更明智地应对这一关键的会计决策。This paper delves into the accounting choices for research and development(R&D)expenses in the field of biotechnology,specifically examining capitalization and expensing as two distinct accounting methods.The article provides an in-depth analysis of the advantages and disadvantages associated with these methods and their potential impacts on companies,investors,and decision-makers.Capitalization enhances the quality of the balance sheet but may introduce greater complexity and tax considerations.On the other hand,expensing aids in short-term profit and cash flow but could lead to the neglect of long-term innovation potential.Additionally,the paper investigates the influence of factors such as company size and type,regulations and industry standards,as well as the nature and quantifiability of R&D projects on accounting choices.Lastly,the article highlights the role of regulatory bodies,offering policy recommendations and future research directions to assist companies in making informed accounting decisions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.85.79