检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾萤 杨丹[1] 刘自敏[1] ZENG Ying;YANG Dan;LIU Zimin(School of Economics and Management,Southwest University,Chongqing 400700,China)
出 处:《中南财经政法大学学报》2024年第1期121-133,共13页Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“乡村振兴视域下脱贫摘帽地区内生发展能力提升的适宜路径与精准政策研究”(21AGL029);教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助重大项目“共同富裕目标下中国农户福利提升的路径和机制研究”(22JHQ021)。
摘 要:农产品加工企业创新是促进乡村产业振兴、推动农业高质量发展的重要驱动力。本文从农地“三权分置”视角,分析中国农地制度改革促进农产品加工企业创新与竞争的理论逻辑,并以农地“三权分置”政策实施为准自然实验,采用倍差法和上市公司数据进行实证检验。研究发现:农地“三权分置”对农产品加工企业的技术创新具有显著促进作用,且对弱垄断势力企业的促进效应更大,这些结论在排除行业发展趋势、全国性政策影响、控制非平行趋势后仍稳健。机制分析表明,农地“三权分置”通过降低农产品加工企业成本促进了技术创新。此外,农地“三权分置”对林产品加工企业创新的促进作用显著大于种植加工与养殖加工企业。研究展现了农地“三权分置”在推动农产品加工企业创新与竞争中的重要作用,为理解中国农地制度改革的经济效应提供了经验证据。Innovation plays a crucial role in revitalizing rural industries and promoting high-quality agricultural development.This paper constructs the theoretical framework of how Chinese rural land system reform fosters competition and innovation in agricultural product processing enterprises from the perspective of the"Three Rights Separation".By treating the"Three Rights Separation"of agricultural land system reform as a quasi-natural experiment and utilizing difference-in-differences method,this study takes empirically tests using the data of listed companies.The research findings are as follows.The implementation of the"Three Rights Separation"has a significant positive impact on technological innovation in agricultural product processing enterprises,this effect is bigger for weak monopoly enterprises,these results remain robust when industry development trends,national policy influences and non-parallel trends are taken into account.The mechanism analysis reveals that the"Three Rights Separation"promotes technological innovation by reducing the costs of agricultural product processing enterprises.Moreover,the innovation promoting effect of the"Three Rights Separation"is significantly higher in the processing of forest products compared to planting and breeding processing enterprises.This paper provides empirical evidence that contributes to a better understanding of the economic effects of Chinese rural land system reform.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.215.45