检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:关鑫 王振田 GUAN Xin;WANG Zhentian(Department of orthopaedics,Chaoyang central hospital,Chaoyang city,Liaoning province 122000)
机构地区:[1]朝阳市中心医院骨外一科,辽宁朝阳122000
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2023年第23期1-4,共4页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察创伤骨科四肢骨折患者外固定架治疗的临床效果。方法:纳入本次研究对象为本院2019年2月—2021年2月收治的100例创伤骨科四肢骨折患者,将患者以随机数字表法分组,每组各50例,对照组采用内固定手术治疗,观察组采用外固定架治疗,对疗效进行观察对比。结果:观察组治疗总有效率高于对照组,观察组手术时间、骨折恢复时间、住院时间均短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,观察组发生并发症例数较对照组少,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。I型前胶原羟基端肽(PICP)、血清骨钙素(BGP)和碱性磷酸酶(BALP)方面,2组术前差异较小(P>0.05);术后,观察组高于对照组,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。生活质量评分方面,观察组术后高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:外固定架治疗四肢骨折的效果比较明显,安全度高,加快骨折部位恢复,对身体创伤比较小,可大力推广应用。Objective:To observe the clinical effect of external fixator in patients with traumatic orthopedic fractures of limbs.Methods:100 patients with traumatic orthopedic limb fracture admitted to our hospital were included in this study.The experiment was carried out from February 2019 to February 2021.The patients were divided into random digital tables,50 cases in each group,and fixed operation in the control group.Results:The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,the operation time,fracture recovery time and hospitalization time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,and the number of complications in the observation group was less than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The effect of external fixator on limb fracture is obvious,the safety degree is high,the recovery of fracture site is accelerated,and the trauma to body is relatively small,so it can be popularized and applied.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171