医学期刊面对论文数据造假的角色选择  

Role of medical journals in data fraud

作　　者：彭传静 叶婷婷[1,2] 魏璐 叶东升 王玲 PENG Chuanjing;YETingting;WEI Lu;YE Dongsheng;WANG Ling(Editorial Department of the Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics of Anhui Medical University,230032,Hefei,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]安徽医科大学第一附属医院,合肥230022 [2]《临床骨科杂志》编辑部,合肥230032 [3]《安徽医科大学学报》编辑部,合肥230032

出　　处：《编辑学报》2023年第5期478-482,共5页Acta Editologica

摘　　要：医学论文中数据占很大的比重,医学论文数据造假违背了学术道德和科学精神,严重影响期刊的质量和作者的声誉。本文从《临床骨科杂志》编辑部近些年的审稿和编校经验出发,在分析临床医学论文数据特点及数据造假危害性的基础上,重点探讨医学期刊在打击论文数据造假中的守门人和啄木鸟式正面角色,以及在助长论文数据造假中的鸵鸟式、协助者和共谋者负面角色,以期提高期刊编辑在审稿和编校过程中对医学论文数据造假的认识。Data presentation accounts for a large proportion in medical publications.However,data fraud in medical papers violates academic ethics and scientific spirit,and seriously affects the quality of journals and the reputation of authors.Based on the review and editing experience of the editorial department of the Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics in recent years,this article analyzes the characteristics of clinical medical paper data and the harm of data fraud.It focuses on exploring the positive roles of medical journals as gatekeepers and woodpeckers in cracking down on paper data fraud,as well as the negative roles of ostriches,facilitators,and conspirators in encouragingdata fraud,in order to raise awareness among journal editors about the falsification of medical paper dataduring the review and proofreading process.

关 键 词：数据造假 角色选择 医学期刊 共谋 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]