开放同行评议中作者-期刊-审稿人-读者的关系重构  

Relationship reconstruction among authors,journals,reviewers,and readers in open peer review process

作　　者：秦雪[1] 王少朋 袁泽轶[1] 杨益[1] 王素萍 QIN Xue;WANG Shaopeng;YUAN Zeyi;YANG Yi;WANG Suping(National Marine Data and Information Service,300171,Tianjin,China)

机构地区：[1]国家海洋信息中心,天津300171

出　　处：《编辑学报》2023年第6期615-620,共6页Acta Editologica

摘　　要：随着开放科学的蓬勃发展,科技期刊从传统同行评议逐步演化为开放同行评议模式,使得读者成为同行评议的参与者之一。本文深入分析对比了传统同行评议模式与开放同行评议模式中“作者-期刊-审稿人-读者”四者关系变化。研究发现,开放同行评议促进了读者与其他三者的交流关系,扩大了作者受益范围,对审稿人和期刊的要求也更为严格。在此基础上,本文提出科技期刊开放同行评议转型需要追求缓而稳的节奏,制订明确规定并充分发挥期刊的媒介作用,帮助作者、审稿人和读者之间进行有效交流和沟通,以保障四者关系的和谐稳定。With the rapid development of open science,scientific journals are gradually evolving from traditional peer review to open peer review,allowing readers to participate in the peer review process.This paper compared the relationship among authors,journals,reviewers and readers in the open peer review model with that of the traditional peer review model.The results showed that open peer review facilitated the communication between readers and the other three parties,benefited the authors in a lager extent,and exerted more requirements on reviewers and journals.Based on the above findings,this article proposed that the transformation of scientific journals to open peer review should pursue a slow and steady pace,establish clear regulations,and fully leverage the media role of journals to help facilitate effective communication and interaction among authors,reviewers,and readers,in order to ensure the harmonious and stable relationship among the four parties.

关 键 词：开放同行评议 关系重构 作者-期刊-审稿人-读者 科技期刊 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]