检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:仝德 任一帆[1,2] 邱君丽 沈月 李汉廷 TONG De;REN Yifan;QIU Junli;SHEN Yue;LI Hanting(Graduate School of Urban Planning and Design,Peking University,Shenzhen 518055,Guangdong,China;Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School Super Urban Space Governance Policy Simulation Social Experiment Center,Shenzhen 518055,Guangdong,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学深圳研究生院城市规划与设计学院,深圳518055 [2]北京大学深圳研究生院超大城市空间治理政策模拟社会实验中心,深圳518055
出 处:《地理研究》2024年第1期136-148,共13页Geographical Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(41971205);北京大学林肯研究院城市发展与土地政策研究中心基金项目(FS06-20221001-QJL);北京大学未来城市实验室(深圳)铁汉科研开放课题基金项目(202103)。
摘 要:城中村是中国大城市普遍存在的居住空间类型。近年来,随着大拆大建的改造模式备受诟病,以统租改造为手段的综合整治行动迅速兴起,但其空间效应仍较少被检视。本文以深圳为研究区,构建空间联立方程,探究城中村私宅租金和统租改造选址的空间交互影响。结果表明:①城中村发生统租改造,会带动本村未改造私宅租金上涨,产生一定程度的绅士化效应。②在控制其他变量的前提下,私宅租金相对较高的城中村更易发生统租改造。③统租改造具有空间溢出效应,通过租金传导机制带动邻村发生统租改造,促进绅士化效应在邻村扩散。因此,在健康可支付住房短缺的大城市,建议地方政府科学规划城中村私宅统租改造的选址,引导城中村统租改造为不同类型、不同价格梯度的租赁住房,建立租金监管机制,积极介入当前以市场为主导的城中村统租改造行为,更加稳妥地推进城中村统租改造。Urbanising village is a typical type of living spaces in large cities in China.As demoliton-rebuilt model of urban regeneration being increasingly criticized,comprehensive improvement is gaining more attention.Under the policy direction of the central government to actively develop rental housing market and increasing rental housing supply,with Shenzhen city as a typical example,micro-regeneration has become the main mode of comprehensive improvement of urbanising villages.In Shenzhen,the micro-regeneration of urbanising villages refers to the comprehensive improvement of urbanising villages,led by specialized housing institutions,to transform villagers′private rental houses into long-term rental apartments,and then centralize these houses to let.Against this context,a rental market pattern in urbanising villages where private rental houses and long-term apartments coexist and interact with each other gradually formed.However,the effects of comprehensive improvement have not been examined yet.Taking Shenzhen as a case study,this paper explores spatial interactions between rents of private rental housing and site selection of micro-regeneration through spatial simultaneous equations.Results show that:(1)Villages that have undergone microregeneration,will raise rents up of private rental houses in the same village and therefore produce a certain degree of gentrification effect.Positive externalities caused by improvements of the living environment,or decreased numbers of private rental houses in the local rental housing market which leads to an increase in private rental housing in urbanising villages.(2)When other conditions are controled,micro-regeneration usually occurs in villages with higher average rents,because vigorous demands of rental housing exist in these villages and enterprises could obtain more rent premiums.What′s more,increased rent accounts for a lower proportion of the original rent,making it easier for tenants to accept rent increase.(3)The micro-regeneration has a spatial spillover effect,w
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49