检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹博 CAO Bo
出 处:《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第1期142-152,172,共12页Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“新型作品的法律确认与保护路径研究”(19CFX054)。
摘 要:智力成果权利证成主流学说的演进历程,说明了意志论和利益论的解释力与影响力,但也呈现出知识产权领域对现代权利理论的更新调整缺乏跟进的缺憾。权利程序理论实现了从实体问题向程序问题的范式转换,建构了主体平等参与、利益评价及规范程序构成的基本模式,但该模式还存在对平等参与的关注局限于形式公平、利益评价仅以个人利益为对象和规范程序只针对立法过程等缺陷。将实质公平的考量、制度利益与公共利益的铺陈以及司法在规范程序中的促进作用,纳入权利程序理论,将补足其存在的理论盲点与逻辑缺陷。以此为据,可归纳出智力成果权利化的程序难题:参与主体的两分结构与修辞表达、利益内涵的多重属性及外部冲突、法律移植的历史局限与文化碰撞。相应的破解之道在于:参与主体的全面罗列与类型界分、利益内涵的澄清与义务履行的实现以及通过疑难案件的裁判实现立法与司法的互动。The evolution of mainstream doctrines in intellectual property rights demonstrates the explanatory capacity and influence of both the will theory and the interest theory.However,it also reveals a deficiency in the field of intellectual property rights to keep pace with the updated adjustment in modern rights theories.The procedural theory of rights has led to a paradigm shift from substantive issues to procedural issues,and constructed the basic model involving equal participation of subjects,the evaluation of interests,and the composition of normative procedures.To address its theoretical blind spots and logical deficiencies,it is crucial to incorporate the consideration of substantive fairness,the presentation of institutional interests and public interests,and the role of the judiciary in regulating procedures into this model.On this basis,the procedural difficulties in the rights-based approach to intellectual property can be summarized as follows:the bifurcated structure and rhetorical expression of participating subjects,the multiple attributes and external conflicts of interests,and the historical limitations and cultural collisions associated with legal transplantation.The corresponding solutions lie in the comprehensive identification and categorization of participating subjects,clarification of the connotation of interests,realization of obligation performance,and interaction between legislation and justice through the adjudication of difficult cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.120.195