检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡雯[1] 夏蓓丽[1] Hu Wen;Xia Beili(Institute of Information,Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences,Shanghai 200235,China)
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2024年第2期25-34,共10页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(22CGL042)。
摘 要:在传统技术路线图的基础上,构建面向颠覆性技术及其新兴产业发展的政策—技术路线图框架,提出防御型、培育型、赋能型3类政策工具在用户需求、市场、产品、技术、参与者5个维度上的作用机制及其顺序逻辑。在此基础上,以中国新能源汽车产业为例,综合采用案例分析和荟萃分析方法,验证该框架的解释力。研究结果表明:政策—技术路线图框架从社会—技术系统转型视角阐释各阶段政策工具与颠覆性技术及其新兴产业发展间的互动演进规律,并提出早期阶段应以防御工具为主,侧重支撑知识空间形成;成长阶段应以培育工具为主,侧重建立良好利基功能;转型阶段应以赋能工具为主,通过适应性和转换性手段促使新旧范式平稳转换。In the process of low-carbon transitions,disruptive technologies can help the technology paradigm get rid of the"carbon lock-in"situation,promote the market structure to subvert the"carbon dependence"pattern,and accelerate the transition of the energy power system towards a greener direction.In the new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation,the research on the response strategy of disruptive technology has gradually made breakthroughs from the enterprise level to the system level.On the one hand,it requires to reshape the relationship between the time dimension and public policy to deal with the high time sensitivity of disruptive technologies;on the other hand,response strategies are expected to develop at a higher level to deal with the social impact of disruptive technologies.In order to provide a better explanation of the dynamic relationship between the development of emerging industries based on disruptive technologies and relevant policy impact,this paper constructs a policy-technology roadmap framework for the development of disruptive technologies and their emerging industries.By introducing the sustainable transition theory of socio-technical system,the framework of integrated policy-technology roadmap(P-TRM)proposed by Huang Cui is improved in two aspects.Firstly,the traditional technology roadmap consists of three levels(market-product-technology),and then the user demand layer and the participant layer are added to realize the embedding of social dimensions and multi-subject analysis.Secondly,the typology of policy instruments is adjusted into three types(shielding,nurturing,and empowerment)to realize the dynamic analysis and transition research in the process of disruptive innovation.Meanwhile,according to the conclusion of theoretical research,a preliminary analysis is made on impact dimensions of policy instruments and multi-level interaction mechanism in the early stage,growth stage and transition stage.Within the analytical framework,empirical research is carried out by
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117