检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董英东 魏雪园 DONG Yingdong;WEI Xueyuan(Bi Quan Academy,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105)
出 处:《绵阳师范学院学报》2024年第1期1-6,33,共7页Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College
基 金:湖南省教育厅重点项目“动态认知逻辑视域下的协议信息研究”(21A0075)。
摘 要:在佛教哲学传统中,有大量展现逻辑的发展进程的资料,印度佛教逻辑学家陈那和法称都研究了推理。虽然他们不认为推理具有重要的作用,但却保留了推理的大多数性质、特征和简洁形式。鉴于记录语言的形式和不同语言间的差异以及佛教逻辑学家与当代哲学家/逻辑学家提出的不同问题,如果承认佛教逻辑为当代的论证所作出的贡献,那么仅以呈现的方式重复材料是有问题的。如果能够从这些资料中提取或抽象出一些逻辑思想,从而实现佛教哲学与逻辑间的对话,并为此提供一些有价值的建议是有意义的。In the Buddhist philosophical tradition,there is a great deal of material showing the developmental process of logic,and both the Indian Buddhist logicians Dignāgā and Dharmakīrti studied reasoning.Although they did not consider reasoning to have an important role,they retained most of the nature,characteristics and concise forms of reasoning.Given the form of the language of recording and the differences between languages,as well as the different questions posed by Buddhist logicians and contemporary philosophers/logicians,it is problematic to repeat the material in a merely presentational manner if one recognizes the contribution that Buddhist logic has made to contemporary argumentation.It would be interesting to extract or abstract some logical ideas from this material so as to enable a dialogue between Buddhist philosophy and logic,and to offer some valuable suggestions to that end.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7