检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王敏[1] 韦杰[1] 唐强 贺秀斌[3] 李进林 Wang Min;Wei Jie;Tang Qiang;He Xiubin;Li Jinlin(Chongqing Observation and Research Station of Earth Surface Ecological Processes in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area,Chongqing Normal University,Chongqing 401331,China;Chongqing Jinfo Mountain Karst Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station,School of Geographical Sciences,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China;Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Process and Ecological Regulation,Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources,Chengdu,Chengdu,Sichuan 610299,China;Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Chongqing 400714,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆师范大学三峡库区地表生态过程重庆市野外科学观测研究站,重庆401331 [2]西南大学地理科学学院重庆金佛山喀斯特生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,重庆400715 [3]中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室,四川成都610299 [4]中国科学院重庆绿色智能技术研究院,重庆400714
出 处:《水土保持通报》2023年第6期256-262,293,共8页Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
基 金:教育部人文社科项目“三峡库区农户参与水土保持:福利效应、影响机制与提升路径研究”(21YJAZH093);重庆英才青年拔尖人才项目(CQYC201905009)。
摘 要:[目的]系统梳理农户参与水土保持的福利效应概念、内涵与评价指标框架,为水土保持福利效应的综合评价提供依据。[方法]结合已有研究报道、相关标准等,阐释水土保持福利效应的概念与内涵,厘清水土保持效益与水土保持福利效应的逻辑关系,梳理水土保持福利效应的评价尺度并提出福利效应评价指标框架。[结果]水土保持福利效应具有评价客体明确、价值可货币化、与参与程度高度相关、个体差异和群体一致等内涵特征。水土保持福利效应评价是对水土保持效益评估的深化和拓展,二者是被包含与包含的关系。水土保持福利效应评价应立足于水土保持效益综合评价,其指标框架包含经济福利、社会福利和生态福利等多个要素。[结论]当前人们对农户参与水土保持的福利效应关注不够。水土保持福利效应的评价着眼于政策性水土保持工程,其评价指标和方法未形成统一认识,还需进一步研究水土保持福利效应的理论及方法体系,以便为新时代水土保持建设提供决策支持。[Objective] A concept,connotation and evaluation index framework of welfare effect of farmers' participation in soil conservation practices was systematically reviewed,which could provide a scientifical basis for comprehensive evaluation of the welfare effect of soil conservation.[Methods] By assembling existing publications and relevant standard documents,the concept and connotation of welfare effect of soil conservation were formulated,and the logical relationship between soil conservation benefits and soil conservation welfare effect.Furthermore,the evaluation scale of the welfare effect of soil conservation was sorted out,and an evaluation index framework for the welfare effect was proposed.[Results] The welfare effect of soil conservation had intrinsic characteristics of clear evaluation objects,monetizable value,high correlation with participation degree,individual difference,and group consistency.It is also considered to be deepened and expanded understandings of the benefits of soil conservation,and this relationship is inter-contained and inter-included.Evaluation of the soil conservation welfare effect should be based on a comprehensive evaluation of soil conservation benefits,and its index framework should include multiple elements such as economic welfare,social welfare,and ecological welfare.[Conclusion] The welfare effect of farmers' participation in soil and water conservation has not yet gained enough attention currently.The evaluation of the welfare effect of soil and water conservation only focuses on policy-based soil and water conservation projects,and its evaluation indicators and methods have not formed a unified understanding.It is necessary to further study the theory and methodology of the welfare effect of soil and water conservation,thereby providing references for decision-making in the construction of soil and water conservation in the new era.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15