检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘坤 PAN Kun(School of Intellectual Property Rights,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210094)
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学知识产权学院,江苏南京210094
出 处:《中国劳动关系学院学报》2024年第1期89-100,共12页Journal of China University of Labor Relations
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国国有企业与CPTPP法律规则对接研究”(项目编号:22AFX020)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:我国“劳动法”对接CPTPP劳工条款有利于我国融入国际经贸规则体系,也有利于避免社会倾销调查。我国“劳动法”对接CPTPP劳工条款的制度框架包括原则性条款、实体权利条款、组织性条款、实施条款和纠纷解决条款。我国“劳动法”与CPTPP劳工条款接合的法律方案可分为国际和国内两个层面。国际层面可利用双边协议争取劳工标准实施的缓冲期、利用程序性规定防止争端解决程序滥用、适时推进结社权和集体谈判权相关公约的批准。国内层面可在海南自贸港提前试行CPTPP劳工规则:在强迫劳动方面,重点推动服刑人员报酬制度改革;在职业歧视方面,重点推动户籍制度改革以消除基于户籍的制度性歧视;在结社权和集体谈判权方面,可参考借鉴CPTPP缔约国越南和新加坡的经验。Aligning China's labor law with CPTPP labor provisions is benefi cial for China to integrate into the international economic and trade rules and also to avoid social dumping investigations.Its institutional framework includes principle clauses,substantive rights clauses,organizational clauses,implementation clauses,and dispute resolution clauses.The legal proposal for aligning China's labor law with CPTPP labor provisions can be divided into international and domestic levels.At the international level,the buffer period for implementing labor standards can be negotiated through bilateral agreements,procedural provisions can be utilized to prevent the abuse of dispute settlement procedures,and efforts can be made to timely approve relevant conventions concerning freedom of association and collective bargaining rights.At the domestic level,the CPTPP labor rules can be implemented in the Hainan Free Trade Port in advance.Specifi cally,in terms of forced labor,the focus can be on reforming the remuneration system for prisoners.Regarding occupational discrimination,efforts can be made to reform the household registration system to eliminate systemic discrimination based on household registration system to eliminate systemic discrimination based on household registration.In terms of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights,experiences from CPTPP signatory countries such as Vietnam and Singapore can be referenced.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.85.73