检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏宇 SU Yu(Law School,People’s Public Security of China,Beijing 10038,China)
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2023年第5期5-17,共13页Journal of Henan Police College
摘 要:我国警察现场执法裁量权内容丰富、来源多样,但裁量权行使的一般规范尚有待完善,导致现场执法容易引发重大法律风险。此种局面一定程度上系由警察法基础理论研究薄弱造成。对此,国内学界与实务界应加强警察法基础理论的研究,从执行警察任务的次序结构、行使警察职权的比例原则、运用警察措施的前提条件等方面形成警察现场执法裁量权的一般规范,并在此基础上凝聚各界共识、提升执法公信力。The police on-site law enforcement discretion in our country is rich in content and diverse in sources,but the general norms for the exercise of discretion need to be improved,otherwise on-site law enforcement is prone to major legal risks.To some extent,this situation is caused by the weak research on the basic theory of police law.In this regard,domestic academic and practical circles should strengthen research on the basic theory of police law,so as to form general norms of on-site law enforcement discretion from the aspects of the order structure of police tasks,the principle of proportionality in the exercise of police functions,and the preconditions for the use of police measures.Thus,consensus from all walks of life can be consolidated and the credibility of law enforcement would be enhanced.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.112.12