检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张义宗 王磊[1,2] 徐阳 Zhang Yizong;Wang Lei;Xu Yang(School of Information Engineering,Nanchang Institute of Technology,Nanchang,330099,China;Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Water Information Cooperative Sensing and Intelligent Processing,Nanchang,330099,China)
机构地区:[1]南昌工程学院信息工程学院,南昌330099 [2]江西省水信息协同感知与智能处理重点实验室,南昌330099
出 处:《南京大学学报(自然科学版)》2023年第5期813-822,共10页Journal of Nanjing University(Natural Science)
基 金:国家自然科学基金(61562061);江西省教育厅科技项目(GJJ2202005,GJJ211920)。
摘 要:当序决策信息系统中的属性集不断变化时,基于优势关系的现有静态算法无法高效地更新其属性约简,为此,从属性增加和属性删除两个角度出发,以知识粒度表征的属性重要度为启发信息,提出两种新的增量属性约简算法.首先介绍优势粗糙集方法的相关基础知识,并将经典粗糙集中基于知识粒度的属性约简算法扩展到优势粗糙集方法,得到可处理序决策信息系统的属性约简算法;然后,给出劣势属性矩阵的定义,并基于知识粒度的矩阵计算方法分析属性增删时属性约简的增量式更新机制,进一步设计了两种增量属性约简算法.最后,分析比较三种算法的时间复杂度,选取了六个不同的UCI数据集进行算法性能的测试,结果表明,提出的算法比静态的属性约简算法更高效.When attribute set in the ordered decision information system is constantly changing,existing static algorithms that have been studied based on dominance relationship cannot efficiently update its attribute reduction.To this end,this paper proposes two new incremental attribute reduction algorithms from the perspective of both attribute addition and attribute deletion,respectively,using the attribute importance of knowledge granularity representations as the heuristic information.Firstly,the relevant basic knowledge of the dominance rough set method are introduced,and the attribute reduction algorithm based on knowledge granularity in the classical rough set is extended to the dominance rough set method to obtain an attribute reduction algorithm that can handle ordered decision information systems;Then,the definition of the inferior attribute matrix is given,and the incremental update mechanism of attribute reduction during attribute addition and deletion is analyzed by the matrix calculation method of knowledge granularity.From there,two incremental attribute reduction algorithms are further designed;Finally,time complexity of the three algorithms is analyzed and compared,and six different UCI datasets are selected to test the algorithm performance.The test results show that the algorithm proposed in this paper is more efficient than the static attribute reduction algorithm.
关 键 词:序决策信息系统 知识粒度 优势粗糙集方法 劣势属性矩阵 增量属性约简
分 类 号:TP391[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38