检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李志君 LI Zhijun(Law School,Dalian Minzu University,116600,Dalian,Liaoning,China)
出 处:《特区经济》2024年第1期49-52,共4页Special Zone Economy
基 金:辽宁省社科规划基金一般项目“证券自律组织自律监管的正当程序问题研究”(L14BFX012)。
摘 要:证券自律规则无论系行政规则属性抑或民事规则属性,司法实践中都绕不开对其效力的审查。司法审查存在宪法、行政法、民商法多个维度,基于自律规则的不同属性,司法审查可能采取行政诉讼或民事诉讼的方式。基于专业尊重的考量,司法审查应原则上穷尽自律组织内部救济,但行政救济不应作为诉讼的前置程序。司法审查应遵循合法性原则和正当程序原则,不同诉讼模式下对自律规则效力的司法审查存在不同效果。Whether it is an administrative rule or a civil rule,securities self-regulation rules cannot be separated from the review of their effectiveness in judicial practice.Judicial review has multiple dimen-sions:constitution,administrative law,civil and commercial law,based on the different attributes of self-regulation rules,judicial review may take the form of administrative litigation or civil litigation.Based on the consideration of professional respect,judicial review should,in principle,exhaust internal remedies of self-regulatory organizations,but administrative remedies should not be used as a pre litiga-tion procedure.Judicial review should follow the principle of legality and due process.There are different effects of judicial review of the effectiveness of self-regulatory rules under different litigation models.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7